Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science

Front Cover
Brian S. Baigrie
University of Toronto Press, May 25, 1996 - Science

The traditional concept of scientific knowledge places a premium on thinking, not visualizing. Scientific illustrations are still generally regarded as devices that serve as heuristic aids when reasoning breaks down. When scientific illustration is not used in this disparaging sense as a linguistic aid, it is most often employed as a metaphor with no special visual content. What distinguishes pictorial devices as resources for doing science, and the special problems that are raised by the mere presence of visual elements in scientific treatises, tends to be overlooked.

The contributors to this volume examine the historical and philosophical issues concerning the role that scientific illustration plays in the creation of scientific knowledge. They regard both text and picture as resources that scientists employ in their practical activities, their value as scientific resources deriving from their ability to convey information.

 

Contents

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Vision
Descartess Scientific Illustrations and la grande
Illustrating Chemistry
Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth
Depicting
Towards an Epistemology of Scientific Illustration
Illustration and Inference
Visual Models and Scientific Judgment
Are Pictures Really Necessary? The Case of Sewall Wrights
BIBLIOGRAPHY
NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1996)

Brian S. Baigrie is an associate professor in the Institute for History and Philosophy of Science and Technology at the Universtiy of Toronto.

Bibliographic information