Contesting Justice: Women, Islam, Law, and Society

Front Cover
State University of New York Press, Mar 10, 2010 - Religion - 211 pages
Contesting Justice examines the development of the laws and practices governing the status of women in Muslim society, particularly in terms of marriage, polygamy, inheritance, and property rights. Ahmed E. Souaiaia argues that such laws were not methodically derived from legal sources but rather are the preserved understanding and practices of the early ruling elite. Based on his quantitative, linguistic, and normative analyses of Quranic texts—and contrary to the established practice—the author shows that these texts sanction only monogamous marriages, guarantee only female heirs' shares, and do not prescribe an inheritance principle that awards males twice the shares of females. He critically explores the way religion is developed and then is transformed into a social control mechanism that transcends legal reform, gender-sensitive education, or radical modernization. To ameliorate the legal, political, and economic status of women in the Islamic world, Souaiaia recommends the strengthening of civil society institutions that will challenge wealth-engendered majoritism, curtail society-manufactured conformity, and bridle the absolute power of the state.
 

Contents

Introduction
1
1 Legal Absolutism and Ethical Relativism
15
2 The Domain of Ethics and the Law
25
3 Basis for the Practice of Polygamy
43
4 Women in Islamic Law of Inheritance
59
5 Women in Modern Times
87
Conclusion
121
Appendix A
127
Appendix B
133
Notes
149
Bibliography
177
Index
191
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2010)

Ahmed E. Souaiaia is Assistant Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Iowa and the author of The Function of Orality in Islamic Law and Practices: Verbalizing Meaning.

Bibliographic information